-

Abstract

The honourable author of the article of "modified and attributive
propositions" (Maqalat wa Barrasiha , No 61, pp.81-103) is seeking to prove that there is a mistake in logic texts, ranging from the translation of
Aristotle's texts to the latest logic books ,regarding the division of propositions and words into modified and attributive ones, in addition to the
discussion of "faculty and privation".(p.41)


The present article distinguishing the recognition of realities from their clarification, introduces the author's fault, that is "counting what isn't the real
cause as the cause". This article, bringing up critical comments, evaluates the honourable author's historical account, and in conclusion, presenting a
meta-logic hypothesis, clarifies the ambiguity existing in historical texts concerning the three mentioned matters.

Keywords