The three expressions of muhkan (explicit), mutash?bih (ambiguous) , and ta‘wil ( hermeneutic interpretation) are Qur’anic terms and since long ago Muslim exegetes have had different views concerning thier meanings and extensions. In his Tafsir al- miz?n, Muhammad Hossein T?b?t?ba’i refers to 16 views concerning the meaning of muhkam and ,mut?shabih and disagrees with all of them. Instead, he poses the 17th view without referring to any criterion in this regard. This article does not intend to offer a new interpretation of this verse, for this issue is a secondary study. Put in other words, by studying the epistemic foundations of each exegete concerning those verses on God, the author tries to show their relationship. The conclusion of this research is that those who believe in tanzih ( declaration of incomparability) theology, consider the tanzihi verses of the Qur’an as explicit and the tashbihi verses as ambiguous. On the contrary, those who believe in tashbihi theology consider tashbihi verses as expilicit and tanzihiverses as ambiguous. Both parties try to interprete ambiguous verses in a way to be in harmony with expilicit verses so as to bring about uniformity in the geometry of their epistemic views.
)