Rctlection on how to confront with the discussing manner of philosophers and theologians and tasting treatment of mystics in methodological divine problem-solving has challenged the transcendent philosophy. Discussion and tasting from Sadra's point of view are two approaches of acquiring knowledge and the limitation of each depends
on certain circumstances. Both levels have ranks and similar results too,
and must be used as an innate tendency in truth- seeking but each domain and also its certain conditions arc different. The acceptance of criticism and criterion are the other opposite position and distinctions of
the both approach. Analyzing Sadra's view on the nature of discussion and tasting and also differences and similarities of the both show that he
considers them as stages of a scientific manner so that each should be
the complement of the other. His model for this integration is interdisciplinary study.
)