The present paper stresses the nobility, necessity and significance of the element of sociology as one of the pillars of opening dialogue by highlighting two clements or philology and sociology in any talk. From Mowlavi's viewpoint, dialogue has been founded on the pillar of connective dialogue between the sides of talk and establishment of mutual relations between speaker (writer) and listener (reader). He has described this mutual relation and sociological approach of word in the language of "connection", "absorption" and "gravitation". From this perspective, presence of addresse or listener or reader for establishment
of verbal connection is not necessary. Also verbal talk or silence will not have any effect on establishment of this verbal interaction. In this connection, it is noteworthy that Mowlavi's has defined gravitation,
attraction and connection in the sense of any link and connection and challenge. Therefore, relations founded on cont1ict. contradiction and
difference such as friendship, enmity, live and hate are worthy of presentation in this realm, as it does not necessitate a type of relation and interaction minus other aspects and do not find expression beside,
in front of or in contrast to "me".
To continue, we will pursue the sociological element of dialogue with comparative perspective with "Logic of Dialogue" by Michael Bakhtin and the "world of Relations" by Martin BubeL The stress laid by the two ideas on social disposition and... of language as well as allusion to definition, concept and various levels and different forms of dialogue from the perspective of Bakhtin in this discourse will he studied. The said discussions in this talk help us arrive at the conclusion that where there is the element of sociology and interactive action, dialogue has been established knowingly or unknowinly or advertently or inadvertently because the meaning and concept is in progress and transfer in the distance of the two horizon whether the element of linguistics is available or not
)